Which rights are typically reviewed with individuals during intake?

The correct answer focuses on the Miranda rights and rights related to detention, which are fundamental during the intake process for individuals who are arrested or detained. The Miranda rights, derived from the U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, require that individuals in custody be informed of their rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. These rights are essential in protecting against self-incrimination and ensuring fair legal representation.

Additionally, rights related to their detention include information about how long they can be held, the reasons for their detention, and their entitlement to legal counsel. Reviewing these rights ensures that individuals understand the legal framework surrounding their situation, which is crucial for the protection of their rights during the judicial process.

The other options involve rights that, while important, are not typically emphasized during the intake process. For example, the right to bear arms and the right to free speech are generally not relevant to the circumstances of an arrest. Similarly, rights like the right to privacy and the right to trial are broader legal principles that come into play at later stages of the judicial process and are not specific to the intake phase.